香港六合彩资料

Competitiveness Policy Evaluation Lab

About the Program

The Competitiveness Policy Evaluation Lab (or ComPEL) is an umbrella program under the Finance, Competitiveness and Innovation Global Practice of the 香港六合彩资料 Group (WBG). It supports the use of impact evaluation clusters in advancing the global knowledge frontier on ‘how to achieve impact,’ building capacity of client institutions and WBG staff, and improving the quality of project design and implementation in the areas of firm performance and productivity, entrepreneurship, innovation, and SME finance.

Impact evaluations under the program help development practitioners, country counterparts, and partners to identify the mechanisms of impacts that work best and inform their decisions on project design, course correction, scale, continuity, selection of cost-effective solutions, and/or targeting.

The Competitiveness Policy Evaluation Lab follows a cluster approach to impact evaluation to determine the impacts attributable to programs in the areas of firm performance and productivity, entrepreneurship, innovation, and SME finance.

The idea is to identify the mechanisms to achieve more impact in key programs and at the same time push the global knowledge frontier on the contributions of the private sector to economic growth and poverty alleviation.

The selection of impact evaluations under a cluster is carried out through competitive rounds involving the identification and capacity building of candidate projects, the technical review and endorsement of detailed methodologies, and the provision of implementation funding to few strategic proposals. 

The following three clusters are currently under implementation: 

Image

Image

Image

Connecting Businesses to Improve Market Access

Targeting Firms with 
High-Growth Potential

Improving Regulatory Efficiency for Firms

Firms can improve performance if new connections are made to other firms, whether they are buyers, suppliers, or peers. Linkages through export promotion, supplier development support, or productive alliances are examples.

Interventions can have larger impacts if firms with specific characteristics are targeted. Scoring schemes to rank startups and business plan competitions are prime examples.

The cost of business compliance with regulations can be lower with more efficient monitoring, information, and accountability schemes.

The following is a curated list of papers related to ComPEL’s focus areas, summarizing existing research and identifying evidence gaps.

Connecting business to improve market access |Targeting firms with high growth potential | Improving regulatory efficiency for firmsCross-cutting areas
 

Connecting business to improve market access


H. Breinlich, D. Donaldson, P.J. Nolen and G. Wright, July 2017


Rocco Macchiavello and Josepa Miquel-Florensa, February 2017


Jing Cai and Adam Szeidl, December, 2016


Meredith Startz, November 2016

Marcel Fafchamps and Simon Quinn, Sep 2016

Wyatt Brooks, Kevin Donovan, and Terence R. Johnson, May 2016


Caio Piza, Tulio Antonio Cravo, Linnet Taylor, Lauro Gonzalez, Isabel Musse, Isabela Furtado, Ana C. Sierra, Samer Abdelnour, April 2016


Julia Cajal Grossi, January 2016


Morgan Hardy and Jamie McCasland, November 2015


David McKenzie and Christopher Woodruff, August 2015


David Atkin, Amit A. Khandelwal and Adam Osman, November 2014


Pol Antras and C. Fritz Foley, May 2014


Michael Grimm and Anna Luisa Paffhausen, May 2014


Nicholas Bloom, Gregory Fischer, Imran Rasul, Andres Rodriguez‐Clare, Tavneet Suri, Christopher Udry, Eric Verhoogen, Christopher Woodruff, and Giulia Zane, December 2013


Julie Subervie and Isabelle Vagneron, Oct 2013


Rocco Macchiavello and Ameet Morjaria, June 2013


Yoonyoung Cho and Maddalena Honorati, April, 2013


David McKenzie and Christopher Woodruff, September 2012


Irani Arraiz and Rodolfo Stucchi, May 2012


Rocco Macchiavello, June 2010


Solomon Asfaw, Dagmar Mithofer, and Hermann Waibel, 2009


Nava Ashraf, Xavier Gine and Dean Karlan, January, 2008

Targeting firms with high growth potential


Arti Grover Goswami, Denis Medvedev, and Ellen Olafsen, 2019

)
Marriane Bertrand and Breno Crepon


Irani Arraiz, Miriam Bruhn, Claudia Ruiz Ortega, and Rodolfo Stucci, 2017


David McKenzie, August 2017


David McKenzie, March 2017


Reshmaan Hussam, Natalia Rigol and Benjamin Roth, November 2016


Matthew Groh, Nandini Krishnan, David McKenzie and Tara Vishwanath, July 2016


Marcel Fafchamps and Christopher Woodruff, April 2016


Nicholas Bloom, Benn Eifert, Aparjit Mahajan, David McKenzie and John Roberts, January 2013

f
Suresh De Mel, David McKenzie and Christopher Woodruff, February 2012


OECD, 2010

Improving regulatory efficiency for firms


Abhijit Banerjee, Esther Duflo, Clement Imbert, Santhosh Mathew and Rohini Pande, November 2016


Claudio Ferraz, Frederico Finan and Dimitri Szerman, February 2016

Building Safety Inspections and Audits in Peru: An Impact Evaluation (website)
Paul Gertler and Ana Goicoechea, 2017


Esther Duflo, Michael Greenstone, Rohini Pande and Nicholas Ryan, October 2014


Chang Tai-Hsieh and Peter J. Klenow, August, 2014


Karthik Murlidharan, Paul Niehuas and Sandip Suktankar, March 2014


Aminur Rahman, August 2013

David McKenzie and Miriam Bruhn, June 2013


Giacomo De Giorgi and Aminur Rehman, June 2013


Gustavo Henrique de Andrade, Miriam Bruhn and David McKenzie, May 2013


Yves Zamboni and Stephan Litschig, January 2013


香港六合彩资料 Group, 2013


Esther Dulfo, Rema Hanna and Stephen P. Ryan, June 2012


Abhijit V. Banerjee, Raghabendra Chattopadhyay, Esther Duflo, Daniel Keniston and Nina Singh, April 2012


Chiara Criscuolo, Ralf Martin, Henry Overman and John Van Reenen, February 2012


Benjamin A. Olken, 2007

Cross-cutting areas


Francisco Campos, Michael Frese, Markus Goldstein, Leonardo Iacovone, Hillary Johnson, David McKenzie, and Mona Mensmann, 2017

Francisco Campos, Aidan Coville, Ana M. Fernandes, Markus Goldstein, and David McKenzie, December 2012

Last Updated: Aug 26, 2019

Impact Evaluation Workshops:

ComPEL hosts flagship impact evaluation workshops gathering a large number of staff, country counterparts, researchers, and partners, with the following objectives:

  • Develop initial design and implementation plans for new impact evaluations through structured clinics sessions.
  • Enhance the technical capacity of staff and clients through training provided in methods sessions.
  • Bring participants up to date with latest research trends and results from relevant impact evaluations through policy and ignite sessions.
  • Strengthen the impact evaluation community on these topics through networking sessions.


Lisbon, Portugal May 31-June 03, 2022:
Agenda

Athens, September 2019: Agenda

Mexico City, February 2017: Agenda and Presentations

Istanbul, May 2015: Agenda and Presentations

Paris, November 2012: